

The legislation allows workers to opt out of paying union dues and instead serve as free riders – meaning take advantage of the benefits that come from a collectively bargained contract. The lawsuit contends that amounts to an illegal taking of unions’ property and resources, since state and federal labor laws require unions to negotiate contracts and provide representation to the non-union employees at “considerable cost” to union members.
The lawsuit also Brown v. Board of Education as well as the 1st and 14th Amendments:
It compares the right-to-work law with laws passed in Southern states in the 1950s as part of the massive resistance to the U.S. Supreme Court’s desegregation orders in Brown v. Board of Education, with legislation intended to discourage membership in the NAACP — laws that were ultimately overturned in court for violating 1st and 14th Amendment rights of free expression and association.
In April, a Wisconsin circuit court judge overturned that state’s right-to-work law in a case that made similar arguments. That ruling has been stayed, pending an appeal to the Wisconsin state Supreme Court.
Related News
- FRA Suspends Safety Reports due to Government Shutdown
- SMART-TD to Port Terminal Railroad Association: Your Harassment Stops Now.
- Honoring the Professional Drivers Who Keep Our Children Safe
- Report Transit Assaults to Help SMART-TD Fight Back
- SMART, SMACNA cohost webinar on building success in residential HVAC
- Another RRB Office Moves to New Location
- Hunting accident claims life of Idaho member’s daughter
- Gardena City Council welcomes SMART-TD to represent GTrans Bus Operators
- NO On-Site Registration Available at Atlanta Regional Training Seminar
- Education Department, Organizing Department hold course on organizing signatory contractors