NORTH OLMSTED, Ohio (October 3, 2019) — Today, the nation’s Class I rail carriers, along with a few other railroads, filed suit in federal district court in the Northern District of Texas in an attempt to undermine our collective bargaining agreements as well as the bargaining process under the Railway Labor Act.
The suit, filed just ahead of the beginning of the next round of national handling scheduled to begin with the Section 6 notice filing November 1, asserts that the carriers’ position that “the existing moratoriums do not bar their crew-consist-related proposals” is a minor dispute subject to arbitration.
As detailed in their complaint, this is not the first time that the rail carriers have attempted an attack on crew consist. SMART Transportation Division President Jeremy Ferguson, noting the carriers’ history of unsuccessful attacks on crew consist, stated, “this latest attempt is nothing new, and it will once again be met with a vigorous defense.”
The suit, denoted as BNSF Railway et al, v, Internat’l Assn. of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers—Transportation Division, has not yet been served on the SMART Transportation Division.
This article will be updated.
Related News
- Tentative Agreement Reached in Boston
- Local Chair Fights for His Members, and Now, a Title
- Nevada railroaders: ACT NOW to help pass a railroad safety bill
- Legislative win means more money for disabled rail workers in New Jersey
- Assembly, No. 1672
- Catching Flies with Honey: Jessica Martin Builds Solidarity on the Local Level
- Historic short-line agreement proves workers are stronger with SMART-TD at their side
- Organizers Use Broad Skill Set to Increase Membership
- SMART solidarity leads to unanimous contract victory at Tri-Rail
- Martha Claugus Marks Three Decades with Alaska Railroad