NORTH OLMSTED, Ohio (October 3, 2019) — Today, the nation’s Class I rail carriers, along with a few other railroads, filed suit in federal district court in the Northern District of Texas in an attempt to undermine our collective bargaining agreements as well as the bargaining process under the Railway Labor Act.
The suit, filed just ahead of the beginning of the next round of national handling scheduled to begin with the Section 6 notice filing November 1, asserts that the carriers’ position that “the existing moratoriums do not bar their crew-consist-related proposals” is a minor dispute subject to arbitration.
As detailed in their complaint, this is not the first time that the rail carriers have attempted an attack on crew consist. SMART Transportation Division President Jeremy Ferguson, noting the carriers’ history of unsuccessful attacks on crew consist, stated, “this latest attempt is nothing new, and it will once again be met with a vigorous defense.”
The suit, denoted as BNSF Railway et al, v, Internat’l Assn. of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers—Transportation Division, has not yet been served on the SMART Transportation Division.
This article will be updated.
Related News
- New Jersey Leads with Rail Safey Law
- “The Safety Program That Works— And Why Railroads Won’t Use It”
- Jobs Still Protected After Merger Delay
- Recommit to the Work Ahead this MLK Day
- Federal Protection for Train Crews Promised by Passenger Rail Crew Protection Act
- New Rail Safety Bill Addresses East Palestine “Vent and Burn” Failures
- Philadelphia Bus Operator Reinstated by Arbitration Victory
- Are You Registered to Vote? Check Your Status Today!
- CSX ENDS OPERATION REDBLOCK
- House passes bill to stop health care price spike for SMART members — General President Coleman responds