In a close vote, the New Hampshire State Senate voted 12-11 to pass right-to-work (for less) in January. The bill then went to the Republican-controlled House for a vote and was expected to pass. The bill surprisingly failed in the House 200-177, with 32 Republicans voting against the measure.
The State House went even further and voted to indefinitely postpone consideration of right-to-work. This means that the N.H. House cannot vote on another right-to-work bill for the next two years. N.H. Governor Chris Sununu (R) was expected to sign the bill into law if it passed in the House.
Click here to read more from OneNewsNow.
According to the AFL-CIO, states that have enacted these so-called right-to-work laws have lower wages and incomes (about $6,000 less per year); little or no health insurance coverage and pay higher premiums; higher poverty rates; higher workplace fatality rates by 49 percent; and lower investments in education. These laws not only hurt unions, but the members who depend on the union as well.
Click here to go to the SMART TD Legislative Action Center (LAC) to contact your state or federal representatives and voice your opposition of right-to-work laws – and also, to voice your support of H.R. 233: two-person crews on all trains.
Related News
- Rail Safety Battle Continues in Colorado Legislature
- Call for photos: “From America’s roads to rails, we want to see your best shots!”
- Department of Defense halts PLAs on construction projects
- A Century of Labor History for the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters
- CSX Threatens Engineers’ Jobs with New “Zero-Zero” Autopilot Technology
- SMART Education Department classes bring members together to strengthen our union
- Legacy: Edmonds Family Mourns a Loss While Celebrating a Future on the Rails
- “Organizing is our lifeblood:” Benson details the role every member plays in strengthening SMART
- UPDATE: Arrangements Announced for Brother Steve Bryant’s Celebration of Life
- Cuts to CSX Peer Training Leave New Hires Without Dedicated Mentors