By Retired GS&T Dan Johnson
In the January issue of UTU News, the two-page centerfold summarized provisions of the Railway Labor Act.
In the February issue, I explained how the Railway Labor Act is purposely designed to encourage both sides to reach a mutually acceptable solution that keeps the trains running.
In the March issue, I discussed the role of the National Mediation Board and the value of joint labor-management problem solving at the negotiating table, which is called “interest-based bargaining.”
After several years of unfruitful hostile bargaining by the previous administration, International President Mike Futhey used interest-based bargaining in January 2008 to reach a national agreement with the major railroads — an agreement overwhelmingly ratified by our membership.
With the national contract again open for amendment, President Futhey and the UTU national contract negotiating team are again pursuing interest-based bargaining with the carriers to produce a contract beneficial to both sides.
Successful joint problem solving requires that both sides understand the needs of the other.
Labor’s challenge in interest-based bargaining is to have a solid understanding of carrier economics. It is not good enough to say we simply want something, because that list is endless.
Related News
- SMART-TD mourns the loss of Local 1374 conductor Erik O’Brien
- SMART University: TD Membership 101 available in Member Portal
- LAST CALL: TD San Antonio Regional Training Seminar room reservations
- Coordinated Bargaining Coalition welcomes face-to-face mediation over national contract negotiations
- The Coordinated Bargaining Coalition again calls on NMB to proffer arbitration
- SMART Transportation Division issues statement on Amtrak board nominees
- Forward Progress
- Women in Construction Week 2022
- CBC unions reject lump-sum offers, seek proffer of arbitration
- Q&A with TD Chief of Staff Jerry Gibson on training