By Retired GS&T Dan Johnson
In the January issue of UTU News, the two-page centerfold summarized provisions of the Railway Labor Act.
In the February issue, I explained how the Railway Labor Act is purposely designed to encourage both sides to reach a mutually acceptable solution that keeps the trains running.
In the March issue, I discussed the role of the National Mediation Board and the value of joint labor-management problem solving at the negotiating table, which is called “interest-based bargaining.”
After several years of unfruitful hostile bargaining by the previous administration, International President Mike Futhey used interest-based bargaining in January 2008 to reach a national agreement with the major railroads — an agreement overwhelmingly ratified by our membership.
With the national contract again open for amendment, President Futhey and the UTU national contract negotiating team are again pursuing interest-based bargaining with the carriers to produce a contract beneficial to both sides.
Successful joint problem solving requires that both sides understand the needs of the other.
Labor’s challenge in interest-based bargaining is to have a solid understanding of carrier economics. It is not good enough to say we simply want something, because that list is endless.
Related News
- Amtrak Thinks No AC Is No Problem! They Are Dead Wrong
- SMART-TD AND CSX CELEBRATE 40 YEARS OF SUCCESS
- Boston rally tomorrow 10/23: Stand with Keolis commuter railroad workers
- United for two-person crews and our members’ rights on BNSF
- SMART-TD Transit Union welcomes FTA’s historic directive to combat operator assaults
- Amtrak agreement ratified by 3-to-1 margin
- SMART-TD reaches tentative agreement with BNSF
- De-escalation training helps conductors avert potential Amtrak disaster
- SMART-TD celebrates Arizona law that protects transit workers
- FRA denies railroads’ request to run without watchdog technology