Eighteen years have passed since the establishment of the California High Speed Rail (CHSR) Authority. Over the course of those eighteen years, high speed rail in the state has been discussed and planned and delayed and delayed more.
There have been proposals, referendums, debates, studies and budgets, but no tracks laid, no passengers queued, no trains roaring between Los Angeles and San Francisco in the promised three hour travel time at speeds exceeding 200 mph.
I began looking into the state of American high speed rail in pursuit of a few simple answers. Why don’t we have the sort of rail infrastructure seen across Europe, in Japan and now in China? What do proponents and opponents say about the various projects underway today? Put simply, what are the pros and cons of funding and maintaining high speed rail lines in this country, and what do our legislators make of them?
Read the complete story at www.attn.com.
Related News
- Boston rally tomorrow 10/23: Stand with Keolis commuter railroad workers
- SMART-TD Transit Union welcomes FTA’s historic directive to combat operator assaults
- Amtrak agreement ratified by 3-to-1 margin
- De-escalation training helps conductors avert potential Amtrak disaster
- SMART-TD celebrates Arizona law that protects transit workers
- FRA denies railroads’ request to run without watchdog technology
- Amtrak general committees announce tentative agreement
- SMART Convention Day 1: DOT secretary headlines day one of SMART General Convention
- New SEPTA operator’s stabbing shows how members’ safety is at risk
- NTS Day 3: America’s transit safer because of union member efforts