Eighteen years have passed since the establishment of the California High Speed Rail (CHSR) Authority. Over the course of those eighteen years, high speed rail in the state has been discussed and planned and delayed and delayed more.
There have been proposals, referendums, debates, studies and budgets, but no tracks laid, no passengers queued, no trains roaring between Los Angeles and San Francisco in the promised three hour travel time at speeds exceeding 200 mph.
I began looking into the state of American high speed rail in pursuit of a few simple answers. Why don’t we have the sort of rail infrastructure seen across Europe, in Japan and now in China? What do proponents and opponents say about the various projects underway today? Put simply, what are the pros and cons of funding and maintaining high speed rail lines in this country, and what do our legislators make of them?
Read the complete story at www.attn.com.
Related News
- NTS Day 3: America’s transit safer because of union member efforts
- SMART-TD transit union conducts first Bus/Transit Day on the Hill
- SMART-TD excited to welcome Coaster to its passenger rail/commuter family
- DIPP assessment decrease takes effect July 1
- Progress in Michigan on bus and rail assaults: Member advocacy NEEDED to finish the job!
- Amtrak execs collect bonuses for a $1.7 billion deficit
- Online fundraiser established for survivors of TD member killed in shooting
- DIPP assessments drop to 32 cents per dollar of daily benefit coverage
- Ground broken on Brightline West — new rail jobs incoming!
- ALERT for L.A.-area members — operator stabbing suspect at large