Posts Tagged ‘annual financial reports’

Class I’s release 4th quarter & 2016 annual earnings

4th Quarter 2016

Net Earnings: $458 million or $0.49 per share, up from $466 million or $0.48 per share in 2015’s 4th quarter
Revenue: Increased by 9 percent to $3,037 billion
Operating Income: Increased to $1 billion over last year’s $791 million
Operating Ratio: 67 percent, an improvement over last year’s 71.6 percent

2016 Annual Earnings

Net Earnings: Decreased to $1.7 billion or $1.81 earnings per share, down from $1.96 billion or $2.00 per share in 2015
Revenue: Decreased to $11.1 billion from $11.8 billion in 2015
Operating Income: Decreased $3.4 billion from $3.6 billion in 2015
Operating Ratio: 69.4 percent
Click here to read CSX’s full earnings report


4th Quarter 2016

Net Earnings: Net income increased by 20 percent to C$3.84 million; diluted earnings per share increased 25 percent to C$2.61 from fourth quarter 2015’s reported C$2.08
Revenue: Decreased 3 percent to C$1.64 billion from C$1.69 billion
Operating Income: Increased 6 percent to C$717 million over fourth quarter 2015’s C$677 million
Operating Ratio: 56.2 percent, a record low

2016 Annual Earnings

Net Earnings: Net income increased by 18 percent to C$1.6 billion from C$1.4 billion; diluted earnings per share increased 27 percent to C$10.63 from C$8.40
Revenue: Decreased 7 percent to C$6.23 billion from 2015’s reported C$6.71 billion
Operating Income: Decreased 4 percent from 2015’s C$2.7 billion to C$2.6 billion
Operating Ratio: 58.6 percent, a record low
Click here to read CP’s full earnings report


4th Quarter 2016

Net Earnings: $1.1 billion or $1.39 per diluted share, an increase of 6 percent
Revenue: Down 1 percent to $5.2 billion
Operating Income: Up 2 percent to $2.0 billion
Operating Ratio: Improved by 1.2 points to 62.0 percent

2016 Annual Earnings

Net Earnings: Decreased by 11 percent to $4.2 billion or 8 percent to $5.07 per diluted share, down from 2015’s reported $4.8 billion or $5.49 per diluted share
Revenue: Decreased to $19.9 billion from $21.8 billion
Operating Income: Decreased by 10 percent to $7.3 billion
Operating Ratio: Increased 0.4 points to 63.5 percent
Click here to read UP’s full earnings report


4th Quarter 2016

Net Earnings: Decreased by 5 percent to $130 million or $1.21 earnings per share
Revenue: Static at $599 million
Operating Income: Decreased by 4 percent to $211 million
Operating Ratio: 64.8 percent, a 1.4 point increase from 2015’s 4th quarter report of 63.4 percent

2016 Annual Earnings

Net Earnings: $480 million or $4.43 per share, down from 2015’s reported $485 million or $4.40 per share
Revenue: Down 3 percent to $2.3 billion
Operating Income: Increased by 2 percent to $819 million
Operating Ratio: 64.9 percent, a 1.9 point improvement over 2015
Click here to read KCS’s full earnings report


4th Quarter 2016

Net Earnings: Increased 8 percent to C$1,018 million; diluted earnings per share increased 12 percent to C$1.32
Revenue: Increased by 2 percent to C$3,217 million
Operating Income: Increased by 3 percent to C$1,395 million
Operating Ratio: 56.6 percent, an improvement of 0.6 points

2016 Annual Earnings

Net Earnings: Increased 3 percent to C$3,640 million; diluted earnings per share rose 6 percent to C$4.67
Revenue: Decreased by 5 percent to C$12,037 million
Operating Income: Increased 1 percent to C$5,312 million
Operating Ratio: Improved 2.3 points to 55.9 percent
Click here to read CN’s full earnings report


4th Quarter 2016

Net Earnings: Increased 15 percent to $416 million; diluted earnings per share increased 18 percent to $1.42
Revenue: Decreased 1 percent to $2.5 billion
Operating Income: Increased 19 percent to $761 million
Operating Ratio: 69.4 percent, a 510 point improvement over 74.5 percent reported for the fourth quarter of 2015

2016 Annual Earnings

Net Earnings: Increased 7 percent to $1.7 billion; diluted earnings per share increased 10 percent to $5.62
Revenue: Decreased by 6 percent to $9.9 billion
Operating Income: Increased 7 percent to $3.1 billion
Operating Ratio: Improved 370 points to 68.9 percent as compared to 2015’s reported 72.6 percent
Click here to read NS’s full earnings report


Note: Operating ratio is a railroad’s operating expenses expressed as a percentage of operating revenue, and is considered by economists to be the basic measure of carrier profitability. The lower the operating ratio, the more efficient the railroad.

RRB submits annual financial reports to Congress

RRB_seal_150pxThe Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) is required by law to submit annual financial reports to Congress on the financial condition of the railroad retirement system and the railroad unemployment insurance system. These reports must also include recommendations for any financing changes which may be advisable in order to ensure the solvency of the systems. In June, the RRB submitted its 2014 reports on the railroad retirement and railroad unemployment insurance systems.

The following questions and answers summarize the findings of these reports.

1. What were the assets of the railroad retirement and railroad unemployment insurance systems last year?

As of Sept. 30, 2013, total railroad retirement system assets, comprising assets managed by the National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust and the railroad retirement system accounts at the Treasury, equaled $26.7 billion. The trust was established by the Railroad Retirement and Survivors’ Improvement Act of 2001 to manage and invest railroad retirement assets. The cash balance of the railroad unemployment insurance system was $192.5 million at the end of fiscal year 2013.

2. What was the conclusion of the 2014 report on the financial condition of the railroad retirement system?

The overall conclusion was that, barring a sudden, unanticipated, large decrease in railroad employment or substantial investment losses, the railroad retirement system will experience no cash-flow problems during the next 25 years. The long-term stability of the system, however, is still uncertain. Under the current financing structure, actual levels of railroad employment and investment return over the coming years will largely determine whether corrective action is necessary.

3. What methods were used in forecasting the financial condition of the railroad retirement system?

The 2014 report projected the various components of income and outgo of the railroad retirement system under three employment assumptions, intended to provide an optimistic, moderate and pessimistic outlook, for the 25 calendar years 2014-2038. The projections of these components were combined and the investment income calculated to produce the projected balances in the railroad retirement accounts at the end of each projection year.

Projecting income and outgo under optimistic, moderate and pessimistic employment assumptions, the valuation indicated no cash-flow problems occur throughout the 25-year projection period under any of the assumptions.

4. How do the results of the 2014 report compare with those of the 2013 report?

The projected tier II tax rates for each calendar year are either the same or lower than in last year’s report. (Railroad retirement payroll taxes, like railroad retirement benefits, are calculated on a two-tier basis.) The projected combined account balances are higher at the end of each year.

The favorable comparison with last year was due to overall favorable economic and employment experience, with the largest impacts resulting from employment exceeding the RRB’s projections and actual investment return of approximately 16 percent exceeding the expected investment return of seven percent in calendar year 2013.

5. Did the 2014 report on the financial condition of the railroad retirement system recommend any railroad retirement payroll tax rate changes?

The report did not recommend any change in the rate of tax imposed by current law on employers and employees.

6. What were the findings of the 2014 report on the financial condition of the railroad unemployment insurance system?

The RRB’s 2014 railroad unemployment insurance financial report was also generally favorable. Even as maximum benefit rates increase 41 percent (from $68 to $96) from 2013 to 2024, experience-based contribution rates are expected to keep the unemployment insurance system solvent. Unemployment levels are the single most significant factor affecting the financial status of the railroad unemployment insurance system. However, the system’s experience-rating provisions, which adjust contribution rates for changing benefit levels, and its surcharge trigger for maintaining a minimum balance, help to ensure financial stability in the advent of adverse economic conditions.

Under experience-rating provisions, each employer’s contribution rate is determined by the RRB on the basis of benefit payments made to the railroad’s employees. Even under the report’s most pessimistic assumption, the average employer contribution rate remains well below the maximum throughout the projection period.

While no surcharge is in effect in calendar year 2014, this year’s report predicts a 1.5 percent surcharge in calendar years 2015 and 2016. A surcharge of 1.5 percent is also likely in calendar year 2017.

7. What methods were used to evaluate the financial condition of the railroad unemployment insurance system?

The economic and employment assumptions used in the unemployment insurance report corresponded to those used in the 2014 report on the financial condition of the retirement system. Projections were made for various components of income and outgo under each of the three employment assumptions, but for the period 2014-2024, rather than a 25-year period.

8. Did the 2014 report on the railroad unemployment insurance system recommend any financing changes to the system?

No financing changes were recommended at this time by the report.