Eighteen years have passed since the establishment of the California High Speed Rail (CHSR) Authority. Over the course of those eighteen years, high speed rail in the state has been discussed and planned and delayed and delayed more.
There have been proposals, referendums, debates, studies and budgets, but no tracks laid, no passengers queued, no trains roaring between Los Angeles and San Francisco in the promised three hour travel time at speeds exceeding 200 mph.
I began looking into the state of American high speed rail in pursuit of a few simple answers. Why don’t we have the sort of rail infrastructure seen across Europe, in Japan and now in China? What do proponents and opponents say about the various projects underway today? Put simply, what are the pros and cons of funding and maintaining high speed rail lines in this country, and what do our legislators make of them?
Read the complete story at www.attn.com.
Related News
- ALERT for L.A.-area members — operator stabbing suspect at large
- Early-bird pricing for TD National Training Seminar ends April 30
- FTA action on bus, transit safety plans praised by SMART-TD
- SMART-TD, FRA announce federal regulation requiring two-person freight crews
- SMART-TD Union Demands Action in Wake of Los Angeles Bus Hijacking
- REEF Act passes in Senate committee
- N.Y. special election — a chance to support Tom Suozzi, who supports our members
- Registration open for Albuquerque RTS
- SMART Transportation Division announces members of Bus and Transit Assault Prevention and Safety committee
- FTA announces random drug and alcohol testing rates for 2024